api.geoprimitives.dev

https://api.geoprimitives.dev/v1/elevation
down

Shares a payout wallet with 20 other endpoints — its adoption is attributed from that shared wallet's traffic, not earned exclusively.

Give it a latitude and longitude and it answers with the ground elevation there in metres above NAVD88, read from the USGS 3D Elevation Program seamless DEM. Parameters go in the query string: this is a GET, there is no body. COVERAGE, stated up front because it is the first thing to check: the state of Alaska, whole, and nothing else yet. The coverage gate reads the coordinate, so it runs in the handler and after payment, not in front of the 402: a coordinate outside Alaska is quoted like any other and then refused with outside_coverage. A refusal does not settle, so nothing is charged, but it costs a signature and a second round trip to find out. Check the coverage against this description or the free catalog first. The conterminous United States and Hawaii are the next extension and arrive through the same pipeline with no change to this interface; every response repeats the coverage under `coverage` so an agent never infers it from an error. Canada is not served even where USGS publishes pixels over it: those come from Natural Resources Canada under a licence with an attribution clause, and this catalog carries public-domain data only, so they were not stored. SOURCE AND VINTAGE: USGS 3DEP seamless 2 arc-second product, the resolution USGS publishes for Alaska, a work of the United States government in the public domain (17 U.S.C. 105). A 2 arc-second pixel is about 62 m north to south and 20 to 30 m east to west at Alaskan latitudes; the response states the pixel size at your latitude. USGS republishes blocks as new lidar and IFSAR arrive, and the response carries the publication date of the block that answered you. Heights are orthometric, NAVD88, metres; horizontal positions are NAD83, which this endpoint reads as WGS 84 since the two differ by under two metres, a fraction of a pixel. INTERPOLATION: bilinear over the four pixel centres around the point by default, which is what GDAL and PROJ do for a continuous surface. Pass interpolation=nearest for the raster's own value at the pixel the point falls in, which is bit-identical to gdallocationinfo on the USGS file and the right choice when you want the source unblended. Checked against GDAL rather than against itself: of 200 coordinates drawn over the built blocks, the 150 inside the coverage agreed with `gdallocationinfo -r bilinear` on the USGS GeoTIFFs to 6.2e-4 m at worst, and interpolation=nearest agreed with plain `gdallocationinfo` to the millimetre this endpoint rounds to. The response always names the method used. VOIDS AND WATER: gaps in the USGS footprint and the Canadian side of the border are void, and so is open water beyond the three-mile county limit. A void pixel inside a bilinear window is dropped and the remaining weights renormalised, as gdalwarp treats nodata, and the response says how many of the four were used. A window that is entirely void is refused with no_data and not charged, never answered with zero. Inshore water is a different case and you should know it: USGS writes 0 over the sea in some blocks and nodata in others, so a coordinate in a harbour or a bay inside the county limit may answer 0 m, which is the source's value and not a measurement of anything. ACCURACY of the data itself is USGS's, not this endpoint's: the Alaska seamless layer is built from IFSAR at 5 m resampled to 2 arc-seconds, and USGS states its vertical accuracy per source project rather than for the seamless layer as a whole. Expect metre-level agreement with a survey on open terrain and worse under forest and on steep slopes. This endpoint adds nothing to that error beyond interpolation. Longitude and latitude are checked against EPSG:4326 bounds first. Reproject with POST /v1/transform if you are not already in WGS 84 or NAD83. For a line rather than a point use POST /v1/elevation/profile, which samples along a polyline in one call.

19
reliability

Reliability & health

Uptime and response time from our own unpaid probes, plus the reliability score built from them.

Uptime

0.0% avg
0% 50% 100% Fri 7 PM

Response time

0ms 50ms 100ms Fri 7 PM
Data table
Reliability history per time bucket over the last 7 days (hourly).
Bucket Uptime Probes Response time
8/21/2026, 7:00:00 PM 0% 1
19
Composite reliability — the weighted average of the dimensions below, on a 0–100 scale.
Availability
0

How often it was reachable when we probed it (weight 35%).

Latency
not yet measured

How quickly it answers when it is up — fast scores high (weight 20%).

Security
100

Whether it serves over working TLS / https (weight 15%).

Transparency
36

Whether the operator disclosed what it does — description, schema, identity (weight 15%).

Activity
2

Observed on-chain payments to this endpoint's wallet — transactions, volume, and distinct paying wallets over the last month (weight 15%; not yet measured when we have not seen its wallet settle).

Confidence 2% — how much probe evidence backs this score. A thin history is flagged, not hidden.

See the scoring methodology for exactly how each number is computed.

Payment

Currencies
USDC
Networks
base
Facilitator
unknown
SDK
unknown

Operator

Company
inferred — unknown
Jurisdiction
Registrar
CloudFlare, Inc.
Domain registered
2026-08-20
Hosting network
CLOUDFLARENET
Hosting country

Operator context is derived from public RDAP/TLS records and unverified. Company and country are only available for endpoints that publish them (an OV/EV TLS certificate or a non-redacted domain record); most endpoints are CDN-fronted and disclose neither.

On-chain activity (base)

98
payments (30d)
0.56
USD volume (30d)
2
paying wallets (30d)

Payments per day

last payment 8/22/2026
0 35 70 Aug 21Aug 22
Data table
Settled payments per day.
Day Payments Volume (USD) Paying wallets
8/21/2026 33 0.23 1
8/22/2026 65 0.33 1

This payout wallet is shared: figures cover all 21 endpoints paid at it, since payments cannot be attributed to one of them. Only payments settled on chains and facilitators we index.

Linked by wallet — likely same operator

On-chain agent identity and the x402 endpoint that shares its settlement wallet.