presign-guard.fizzl.eu

https://presign-guard.fizzl.eu/v1/token

Shares a payout wallet with 30 other endpoints — its adoption is attributed from that shared wallet's traffic, not earned exclusively.

Is this token safe to buy, or a honeypot or rug pull? Checks a Solana or EVM token before you buy, hold or accept it (mint or freeze authority still active, LP not locked, buy/sell tax, low liquidity, brand-new token, concentrated holders) and answers green/orange/red with a grade (SAFE/CAUTION/RISKY/AVOID), the reasons, a one-line summary and market data

60
reliability

Reliability & health

Uptime and response time from our own unpaid probes, plus the reliability score built from them.

Uptime

100.0% avg
0% 50% 100% Tue 12 AMThu 5 AMSat 10 AMMon 10 PM

Response time

p50 246ms · p95 563ms
0ms 650ms 1300ms Tue 12 AMThu 5 AMSat 10 AMMon 10 PM
Data table
Reliability history per time bucket over the last 7 days (hourly).
Bucket Uptime Probes Response time
9/29/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 1 426ms
9/29/2026, 2:00:00 AM 100% 1 467ms
9/29/2026, 4:00:00 AM 100% 1 291ms
9/29/2026, 6:00:00 AM 100% 1 142ms
9/29/2026, 8:00:00 AM 100% 1 110ms
9/29/2026, 10:00:00 AM 100% 1 1217ms
9/29/2026, 12:00:00 PM 100% 1 155ms
9/29/2026, 2:00:00 PM 100% 1 136ms
9/29/2026, 4:00:00 PM 100% 1 149ms
9/29/2026, 6:00:00 PM 100% 1 552ms
9/29/2026, 8:00:00 PM 100% 1 179ms
9/29/2026, 10:00:00 PM 100% 1 241ms
9/30/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 173ms
9/30/2026, 3:00:00 AM 100% 1 224ms
9/30/2026, 5:00:00 AM 100% 1 643ms
9/30/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 229ms
9/30/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 328ms
9/30/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 242ms
9/30/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 330ms
9/30/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 249ms
9/30/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 561ms
9/30/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 618ms
9/30/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 262ms
9/30/2026, 11:00:00 PM 100% 1 237ms
10/1/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 292ms
10/1/2026, 3:00:00 AM 100% 1 121ms
10/1/2026, 5:00:00 AM 100% 1 124ms
10/1/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 285ms
10/1/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 226ms
10/1/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 221ms
10/1/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 556ms
10/1/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 223ms
10/1/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 256ms
10/1/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 243ms
10/1/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 251ms
10/1/2026, 11:00:00 PM 100% 1 476ms
10/2/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 258ms
10/2/2026, 3:00:00 AM 100% 1 300ms
10/2/2026, 5:00:00 AM 100% 1 270ms
10/2/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 92ms
10/2/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 156ms
10/2/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 156ms
10/2/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 130ms
10/2/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 371ms
10/2/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 306ms
10/2/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 140ms
10/2/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 142ms
10/2/2026, 10:00:00 PM 100% 1 94ms
10/3/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 1 158ms
10/3/2026, 2:00:00 AM 100% 1 253ms
10/3/2026, 4:00:00 AM 100% 1 152ms
10/3/2026, 6:00:00 AM 100% 1 194ms
10/3/2026, 8:00:00 AM 100% 1 171ms
10/3/2026, 10:00:00 AM 100% 1 163ms
10/3/2026, 12:00:00 PM 100% 1 271ms
10/3/2026, 2:00:00 PM 100% 1 160ms
10/3/2026, 4:00:00 PM 100% 1 160ms
10/3/2026, 6:00:00 PM 100% 1 167ms
10/3/2026, 8:00:00 PM 100% 1 128ms
10/3/2026, 11:00:00 PM 100% 1 99ms
10/4/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 491ms
10/4/2026, 2:00:00 AM 100% 1 288ms
10/4/2026, 4:00:00 AM 100% 1 317ms
10/4/2026, 6:00:00 AM 100% 1 455ms
10/4/2026, 8:00:00 AM 100% 1 437ms
10/4/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 130ms
10/4/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 347ms
10/4/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 401ms
10/4/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 610ms
10/4/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 270ms
10/5/2026, 2:00:00 AM 100% 1 88ms
10/5/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 90ms
10/5/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 285ms
10/5/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 253ms
10/5/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 91ms
10/5/2026, 2:00:00 PM 100% 1 305ms
10/5/2026, 4:00:00 PM 100% 1 332ms
10/5/2026, 6:00:00 PM 100% 1 107ms
10/5/2026, 8:00:00 PM 100% 1 276ms
10/5/2026, 10:00:00 PM 100% 1 338ms
60
Composite reliability — the weighted average of the dimensions below, on a 0–100 scale.
Availability
100

How often it was reachable when we probed it (weight 35%).

Latency
100

How quickly it answers when it is up — fast scores high (weight 20%).

Security
100

Whether it serves over working TLS / https (weight 15%).

Transparency
61

Whether the operator disclosed what it does — description, schema, identity (weight 15%).

Activity
3

Observed on-chain payments to this endpoint's wallet — transactions, volume, and distinct paying wallets over the last month (weight 15%; not yet measured when we have not seen its wallet settle).

Confidence 100% — how much probe evidence backs this score. A thin history is flagged, not hidden.

See the scoring methodology for exactly how each number is computed.

Payment

Currencies
USDC
Networks
base, solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp
Facilitator
unknown
SDK
unknown

Operator

Company
inferred — unknown
Jurisdiction
—
Registrar
—
Domain registered
—
Hosting network
RS-1125
Hosting country
—

Operator context is derived from public RDAP/TLS records and unverified. Company and country are only available for endpoints that publish them (an OV/EV TLS certificate or a non-redacted domain record); most endpoints are CDN-fronted and disclose neither.

On-chain activity (base)

139
payments (30d)
5.4
USD volume (30d)
13
paying wallets (30d)

Payments per day

last payment 10/5/2026
0 20 40 Sep 21Sep 26Sep 30Oct 5
Data table
Settled payments per day.
Day Payments Volume (USD) Paying wallets
9/21/2026 1 0.1 1
9/22/2026 3 0.06 2
9/23/2026 2 0.01 1
9/24/2026 8 0.48 2
9/25/2026 8 0.92 3
9/26/2026 37 1 1
9/27/2026 15 1.05 2
9/28/2026 14 0.66 3
9/29/2026 16 0.18 4
9/30/2026 5 0.01 2
10/1/2026 3 0.07 1
10/2/2026 2 0.01 1
10/3/2026 1 0 1
10/4/2026 20 0.84 2
10/5/2026 4 0.01 2

This payout wallet is shared: figures cover all 31 endpoints paid at it, since payments cannot be attributed to one of them. Only payments settled on chains and facilitators we index.

Linked by wallet — likely same operator

On-chain agent identity and the x402 endpoint that shares its settlement wallet.

Response schema
{
  "properties": {
    "checkedAt": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "grade": {
      "enum": [
        "SAFE",
        "CAUTION",
        "RISKY",
        "AVOID"
      ],
      "type": "string"
    },
    "market": {
      "description": "DexScreener data: priceUsd, liquidityUsd, marketCapUsd, volume24hUsd, firstPairAt, ageSeconds, url",
      "type": [
        "object",
        "null"
      ]
    },
    "one_liner": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "reasons": {
      "items": {
        "properties": {
          "code": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "details": {},
          "severity": {
            "enum": [
              "red",
              "orange",
              "info"
            ],
            "type": "string"
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "code",
          "severity"
        ],
        "type": "object"
      },
      "type": "array"
    },
    "receipt": {
      "description": "Signature over this whole answer (without receipt.signature), so the verdict can be verified later: EIP-191 personal_sign over canonical JSON (sorted keys, compact, ASCII-escaped). Signer addresses: /.well-known/presign-guard-signer.json; free check: POST /v1/verify.",
      "properties": {
        "algorithm": {
          "enum": [
            "eip191-canonical-json-v1"
          ],
          "type": "string"
        },
        "cert": {
          "description": "The payout wallet's certificate for this signing key: personal_sign by authority over 'fizzl receipt signer\\nservice: <service>\\nsigner: <signer>\\nvalid_from: <date>'. Pin the payout wallet and a rotated key still verifies.",
          "properties": {
            "authority": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "service": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "signature": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "signer": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "valid_from": {
              "type": "string"
            }
          },
          "type": "object"
        },
        "input_sha256": {
          "description": "sha256 of canonical JSON {route, input}: your body (POST) or query parameters (GET)",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "payment": {
          "description": "The payment behind this answer, from your x402 payment payload. EVM: payer + EIP-3009 nonce; find the settlement as AuthorizationUsed(payer, nonce) on the asset contract. Solana: payer + sha256 of the signed transaction you sent.",
          "properties": {
            "amount": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "asset": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "network": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "nonce": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "pay_to": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "payer": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "proof": {
              "enum": [
                "eip3009",
                "svm-transaction"
              ],
              "type": "string"
            },
            "transaction_sha256": {
              "type": "string"
            }
          },
          "type": "object"
        },
        "request_id": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "route": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "signature": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "signed_at": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "signer": {
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "request_id",
        "route",
        "input_sha256",
        "signed_at",
        "signer",
        "algorithm",
        "signature"
      ],
      "type": "object"
    },
    "sources": {
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "type": "array"
    },
    "token": {
      "type": "object"
    },
    "verdict": {
      "enum": [
        "green",
        "orange",
        "red"
      ],
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "verdict",
    "grade",
    "one_liner",
    "reasons"
  ],
  "type": "object"
}