TrustAgent

https://trust-agent.io/v1/verify/quick

Shares a payout wallet with 10 other endpoints — its adoption is attributed from that shared wallet's traffic, not earned exclusively.

Is this counterparty safe to pay or accept payment from? Screens it against the OFAC sanctions list, then SYBIL-FILTERS its ERC-8004 reputation: reviewers are clustered by funding source, one vote each, so feedback bought from one purse counts once. Returns an explainable 0-100 score, a proceed / hold / block recommendation, and insufficient_data rather than a guess. Free alternative: GET /v1/verify. Trial: 3 free calls/wallet/24h — https://trust-agent.io/v1/trial.

63
reliability

Reliability & health

Uptime and response time from our own unpaid probes, plus the reliability score built from them.

Uptime

100.0% avg
0% 50% 100% Mon 8 PMThu 1 AMSat 6 AMMon 6 PM

Response time

p50 22ms · p95 121ms
0ms 100ms 200ms Mon 8 PMThu 1 AMSat 6 AMMon 6 PM
Data table
Reliability history per time bucket over the last 7 days (hourly).
Bucket Uptime Probes Response time
9/28/2026, 8:00:00 PM 100% 1 72ms
9/28/2026, 10:00:00 PM 100% 1 101ms
9/29/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 1 140ms
9/29/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 124ms
9/29/2026, 3:00:00 AM 100% 1 130ms
9/29/2026, 5:00:00 AM 100% 1 63ms
9/29/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 115ms
9/29/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 118ms
9/29/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 60ms
9/29/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 38ms
9/29/2026, 2:00:00 PM 100% 1 113ms
9/29/2026, 4:00:00 PM 100% 1 87ms
9/29/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 114ms
9/29/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 70ms
9/29/2026, 11:00:00 PM 100% 1 99ms
9/30/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 101ms
9/30/2026, 3:00:00 AM 100% 1 121ms
9/30/2026, 5:00:00 AM 100% 1 129ms
9/30/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 89ms
9/30/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 29ms
9/30/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 25ms
9/30/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 25ms
9/30/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 21ms
9/30/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 22ms
9/30/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 26ms
9/30/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 16ms
9/30/2026, 11:00:00 PM 100% 1 17ms
10/1/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 23ms
10/1/2026, 3:00:00 AM 100% 1 28ms
10/1/2026, 5:00:00 AM 100% 1 84ms
10/1/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 23ms
10/1/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 17ms
10/1/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 27ms
10/1/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 16ms
10/1/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 27ms
10/1/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 25ms
10/1/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 27ms
10/1/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 22ms
10/1/2026, 11:00:00 PM 100% 1 17ms
10/2/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 17ms
10/2/2026, 3:00:00 AM 100% 1 22ms
10/2/2026, 5:00:00 AM 100% 1 16ms
10/2/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 17ms
10/2/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 22ms
10/2/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 16ms
10/2/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 17ms
10/2/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 33ms
10/2/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 17ms
10/2/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 19ms
10/2/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 23ms
10/2/2026, 11:00:00 PM 100% 1 23ms
10/3/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 1 17ms
10/3/2026, 2:00:00 AM 100% 1 19ms
10/3/2026, 4:00:00 AM 100% 1 23ms
10/3/2026, 6:00:00 AM 100% 1 17ms
10/3/2026, 8:00:00 AM 100% 1 18ms
10/3/2026, 10:00:00 AM 100% 1 17ms
10/3/2026, 12:00:00 PM 100% 1 20ms
10/3/2026, 2:00:00 PM 100% 1 20ms
10/3/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 22ms
10/3/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 17ms
10/3/2026, 7:00:00 PM 100% 1 23ms
10/3/2026, 9:00:00 PM 100% 1 18ms
10/3/2026, 11:00:00 PM 100% 1 16ms
10/4/2026, 1:00:00 AM 100% 1 19ms
10/4/2026, 2:00:00 AM 100% 1 24ms
10/4/2026, 4:00:00 AM 100% 1 19ms
10/4/2026, 6:00:00 AM 100% 1 17ms
10/4/2026, 8:00:00 AM 100% 1 29ms
10/4/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 16ms
10/4/2026, 3:00:00 PM 100% 1 15ms
10/4/2026, 5:00:00 PM 100% 1 16ms
10/4/2026, 6:00:00 PM 100% 1 20ms
10/4/2026, 8:00:00 PM 100% 1 21ms
10/5/2026, 2:00:00 AM 100% 1 18ms
10/5/2026, 7:00:00 AM 100% 1 15ms
10/5/2026, 9:00:00 AM 100% 1 16ms
10/5/2026, 11:00:00 AM 100% 1 16ms
10/5/2026, 1:00:00 PM 100% 1 18ms
10/5/2026, 2:00:00 PM 100% 1 16ms
10/5/2026, 4:00:00 PM 100% 1 25ms
10/5/2026, 6:00:00 PM 100% 1 30ms
63
Composite reliability — the weighted average of the dimensions below, on a 0–100 scale.
Availability
100

How often it was reachable when we probed it (weight 35%).

Latency
100

How quickly it answers when it is up — fast scores high (weight 20%).

Security
100

Whether it serves over working TLS / https (weight 15%).

Transparency
61

Whether the operator disclosed what it does — description, schema, identity (weight 15%).

Activity
7

Observed on-chain payments to this endpoint's wallet — transactions, volume, and distinct paying wallets over the last month (weight 15%; not yet measured when we have not seen its wallet settle).

Confidence 100% — how much probe evidence backs this score. A thin history is flagged, not hidden.

See the scoring methodology for exactly how each number is computed.

Payment

Currencies
USDC
Networks
base
Facilitator
unknown
SDK
unknown

Operator

Company
inferred — unknown
Jurisdiction
—
Registrar
—
Domain registered
—
Hosting network
RS-1125
Hosting country
—

Operator context is derived from public RDAP/TLS records and unverified. Company and country are only available for endpoints that publish them (an OV/EV TLS certificate or a non-redacted domain record); most endpoints are CDN-fronted and disclose neither.

On-chain activity (base)

37
payments (30d)
0.19
USD volume (30d)
5
paying wallets (30d)

Payments per day

last payment 10/5/2026
0 5 9 Sep 13Sep 29Oct 2Oct 5
Data table
Settled payments per day.
Day Payments Volume (USD) Paying wallets
9/13/2026 9 0.05 1
9/14/2026 1 0 1
9/28/2026 2 0 2
9/29/2026 9 0.06 2
9/30/2026 1 0.01 1
10/1/2026 8 0.03 2
10/2/2026 1 0 1
10/3/2026 3 0.01 1
10/4/2026 2 0.02 1
10/5/2026 1 0.01 1

This payout wallet is shared: figures cover all 11 endpoints paid at it, since payments cannot be attributed to one of them. Only payments settled on chains and facilitators we index.

Linked by wallet — likely same operator

On-chain agent identity and the x402 endpoint that shares its settlement wallet.

Response schema
{
  "properties": {
    "components": {
      "description": "per-rule scoring breakdown; the score is reconstructable from these plus overrides"
    },
    "confidence": {
      "description": "0-1, how much evidence backs the score"
    },
    "flags": {
      "description": "array of {code, severity, title, detail}"
    },
    "overrides": {
      "description": "hard caps applied after weighting, each with from/cap/reason"
    },
    "recommendation": {
      "description": "proceed | proceed_with_caution | hold | block | insufficient_data. insufficient_data means no judgment was possible — treat it as unknown, not as risky."
    },
    "riskBand": {
      "description": "minimal | low | moderate | elevated | severe | unknown"
    },
    "trustScore": {
      "description": "0-100, higher is safer; null when no rule could be evaluated"
    }
  },
  "type": "object"
}