ccs-seller.bbrysonelite.workers.dev

https://ccs-seller.bbrysonelite.workers.dev/v1/lookup/lei/00EHHQ2ZHDCFXJCPCL46

Shares a payout wallet with 4 other endpoints — its adoption is attributed from that shared wallet's traffic, not earned exclusively.

single-fact lei lookup. Answers from a bundled CC0 subset of GLEIF Level 1 data, vintage 2026-08-15: 20000 ACTIVE, ISSUED records cut in ascending LEI order from a 1953582-record pool. The range is not dense, so a valid LEI can sort inside it and still be absent; absence here is absence from THIS snapshot, never from the Global LEI System. An unknown or malformed LEI is refused by name, never guessed. The full bound is stated free in the discovery declaration on this challenge.

58
reliability

Reliability & health

Uptime and response time from our own unpaid probes, plus the reliability score built from them.

Uptime

100.0% avg
0% 50% 100% Aug 18Aug 22Aug 25Aug 29

Response time

p50 175ms · p95 280ms
0ms 100ms 200ms Aug 18Aug 22Aug 25Aug 29
Data table
Reliability history per time bucket over the last 30 days (daily).
Bucket Uptime Probes Response time
8/18/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 1 173ms
8/19/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 21 199ms
8/20/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 20 182ms
8/21/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 22 114ms
8/22/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 22 186ms
8/23/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 20 200ms
8/24/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 21 198ms
8/25/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 15 49ms
8/26/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 9 23ms
8/27/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 14 22ms
8/28/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 21 21ms
8/29/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 3 21ms
58
Composite reliability — the weighted average of the dimensions below, on a 0–100 scale.
Availability
100

How often it was reachable when we probed it (weight 35%).

Latency
100

How quickly it answers when it is up — fast scores high (weight 20%).

Security
100

Whether it serves over working TLS / https (weight 15%).

Transparency
61

Whether the operator disclosed what it does — description, schema, identity (weight 15%).

Activity
1

Observed on-chain payments to this endpoint's wallet — transactions, volume, and distinct paying wallets over the last month (weight 15%; not yet measured when we have not seen its wallet settle).

Confidence 100% — how much probe evidence backs this score. A thin history is flagged, not hidden.

See the scoring methodology for exactly how each number is computed.

Payment

Currencies
USDC
Networks
base
Facilitator
unknown
SDK
unknown

Operator

Company
inferred — unknown
Jurisdiction
Registrar
Domain registered
Hosting network
CLOUDFLARENET
Hosting country

Operator context is derived from public RDAP/TLS records and unverified. Company and country are only available for endpoints that publish them (an OV/EV TLS certificate or a non-redacted domain record); most endpoints are CDN-fronted and disclose neither.

On-chain activity (base)

8
payments (30d)
0.03
USD volume (30d)
1
paying wallets (30d)

Payments per day

last payment 8/22/2026
0 3 6 Aug 17Aug 18Aug 22
Data table
Settled payments per day.
Day Payments Volume (USD) Paying wallets
8/17/2026 1 0 1
8/18/2026 6 0.03 1
8/22/2026 1 0.01 1

This payout wallet is shared: figures cover all 5 endpoints paid at it, since payments cannot be attributed to one of them. Only payments settled on chains and facilitators we index.

Linked by wallet — likely same operator

On-chain agent identity and the x402 endpoint that shares its settlement wallet.

Response schema
{
  "input": {
    "discoverable": true,
    "method": "GET",
    "pathParams": {
      "lei": "the 20-character ISO 17442 legal entity identifier to resolve"
    },
    "type": "http"
  },
  "output": {
    "schema_version": "lei-lookup.v1",
    "source": {
      "coverage": "Bounded subset of the GLEIF Level 1 pool: 20000 LEI records, cut in ascending LEI order from the 1953582 records whose entity status is ACTIVE and whose registration status is ISSUED at the retrieval recorded in this module. 20200 candidates were read in that order, 21 were refused by the bundle sanitizer (guard-vocabulary and format screens), and the admitted remainder was cut at 20000. Some of those refusals fall INSIDE this LEI range, so a checksum-valid LEI can be missing here even when it sorts within the range — and a LEI missing here is missing from THIS snapshot only, never from the Global LEI System, which holds far more records than are bundled. Growing coverage is a bigger snapshot and a redeploy, never a live fetch.",
      "name": "GLEIF Level 1 LEI reference data (legal entity records), Access Service",
      "snapshot_sha256": "a56f5561e2cc620fc50a3bdaa88478f37eb1cdaf5e72c41129dc681a8dd34805",
      "vintage": "2026-08-15"
    }
  },
  "routeTemplate": "/v1/lookup/lei/:lei"
}