api.insumermodel.com

https://api.insumermodel.com/v1/attest

Shares a payout wallet with 2 other endpoints — its adoption is attributed from that shared wallet's traffic, not earned exclusively.

Signed attestation (ECDSA plus a post-quantum ML-DSA-65 companion) of on-chain wallet conditions across 37 chains: token balance, NFT ownership, EAS, Farcaster, view calls, ratio rules, and agent standing (ERC-8004 registration, ERC-7710 delegation validity with revocation proof). A verifiable boolean, never raw balances. Up to 10 conditions per pay-per-call request. Pay in USDC on Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Arc, or Solana.

65
reliability

Reliability & health

Uptime and response time from our own unpaid probes, plus the reliability score built from them.

Uptime

100.0% avg
0% 50% 100% Sep 6Sep 16Sep 25Oct 5

Response time

p50 237ms · p95 333ms
0ms 200ms 400ms Sep 6Sep 16Sep 25Oct 5
Data table
Reliability history per time bucket over the last 30 days (daily).
Bucket Uptime Probes Response time
9/6/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 17 255ms
9/7/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 15 259ms
9/8/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 21 289ms
9/9/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 20 302ms
9/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 14 264ms
9/11/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 10 274ms
9/12/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 9 248ms
9/13/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 16 262ms
9/14/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 15 280ms
9/15/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 16 233ms
9/16/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 16 254ms
9/17/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 15 270ms
9/18/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 13 250ms
9/19/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 13 233ms
9/20/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 12 244ms
9/21/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 12 248ms
9/22/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 12 253ms
9/23/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 12 254ms
9/24/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 14 251ms
9/25/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 13 269ms
9/26/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 14 229ms
9/27/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 13 218ms
9/28/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 13 240ms
9/29/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 12 250ms
9/30/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 11 224ms
10/1/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 12 234ms
10/2/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 12 228ms
10/3/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 12 222ms
10/4/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 10 61ms
10/5/2026, 12:00:00 AM 100% 8 93ms
65
Composite reliability — the weighted average of the dimensions below, on a 0–100 scale.
Availability
100

How often it was reachable when we probed it (weight 35%).

Latency
100

How quickly it answers when it is up — fast scores high (weight 20%).

Security
100

Whether it serves over working TLS / https (weight 15%).

Transparency
61

Whether the operator disclosed what it does — description, schema, identity (weight 15%).

Activity
15

Observed on-chain payments to this endpoint's wallet — transactions, volume, and distinct paying wallets over the last month (weight 15%; not yet measured when we have not seen its wallet settle).

Confidence 100% — how much probe evidence backs this score. A thin history is flagged, not hidden.

See the scoring methodology for exactly how each number is computed.

Payment

Currencies
USDC
Networks
arbitrum, base, eip155:5042, polygon, solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp
Facilitator
unknown
SDK
unknown

Operator

Company
inferred — unknown
Jurisdiction
—
Registrar
GoDaddy.com, LLC
Domain registered
2025-07-26
Hosting network
CLOUDFLARENET
Hosting country
—

Operator context is derived from public RDAP/TLS records and unverified. Company and country are only available for endpoints that publish them (an OV/EV TLS certificate or a non-redacted domain record); most endpoints are CDN-fronted and disclose neither.

On-chain activity (base)

26
payments (30d)
2.7
USD volume (30d)
6
paying wallets (30d)

Payments per day

last payment 10/5/2026
0 3 5 Sep 9Sep 20Oct 1Oct 5
Data table
Settled payments per day.
Day Payments Volume (USD) Paying wallets
9/9/2026 1 0.05 1
9/11/2026 4 0.5 3
9/17/2026 3 0.15 2
9/20/2026 1 0.05 1
9/21/2026 3 0.35 1
9/26/2026 1 0.05 1
9/30/2026 1 0.05 1
10/1/2026 4 0.65 2
10/2/2026 2 0.15 1
10/3/2026 3 0.35 1
10/5/2026 3 0.35 1

This payout wallet is shared: figures cover all 3 endpoints paid at it, since payments cannot be attributed to one of them. Only payments settled on chains and facilitators we index.

Linked by wallet — likely same operator

On-chain agent identity and the x402 endpoint that shares its settlement wallet.

Response schema
{
  "properties": {
    "data": {
      "properties": {
        "attestation": {
          "$ref": "#/components/schemas/Attestation"
        },
        "jwt": {
          "description": "Wallet Auth by InsumerAPI token — ES256 JWT (only present when format: \"jwt\" is requested). Verifiable with any standard JWT library using the JWKS endpoint.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "kid": {
          "description": "Which key + scheme signed this response. insumer-attest-v1 (v1 attest) or insumer-attest-v2 (v2 attest). Resolve the public key from GET /v1/jwks or https://insumermodel.com/.well-known/jwks.json (all EC kids share one key; post-quantum AKP entries are appended after them).",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "pqJwt": {
          "description": "OPTIONAL sibling of `jwt` when format is `jwt`: a compact JWS with alg ML-DSA-65 (RFC 9964), signed under the post-quantum key insumer-attest-pq1. Additive; `jwt` is unchanged. Verifier contract: after verifying the JWS over its own header.payload bytes, confirm that its payload and the ES256 `jwt` payload carry the identical claim set: the same member names, and for every member a deeply equal JSON value (objects compared without regard to member order, arrays in order, numbers by value). Any difference, whether a changed value, a missing member or an extra member on either side, makes the companion `refuted`. Compare PARSED JSON, never bytes: byte-identical payload segments satisfy this trivially, but a verifier MUST NOT require byte identity, since two serializers may order members differently. Checking only `jti`, `exp` and `pass` is not sufficient: it leaves `results` and `conditionHash` unbound. See the state attestation spec, Section 12 Check 6, and test vectors 24 and 25 (the refused cases).\n",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "pqKid": {
          "description": "OPTIONAL post-quantum key identifier (insumer-attest-pq1 or insumer-trust-pq1), resolved in the JWKS as an RFC 9964 AKP / ML-DSA-65 key.",
          "example": "insumer-attest-pq1",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "pqSig": {
          "description": "OPTIONAL post-quantum companion signature: base64 ML-DSA-65 (FIPS 204) over the post-quantum domain tag plus the exact classical preimage this response's kid selects. A kid a verifier does not recognise selects no preimage, so the companion is then unverifiable, never refuted, and no other era's preimage may be substituted for it. Additive; sig and kid are unchanged. See the state attestation spec, Section 12 Check 6.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "sig": {
          "description": "ECDSA P-256 signature (base64, P1363). Branch on `kid` to reconstruct the signed bytes: `insumer-attest-v1` → ES256 over JSON.stringify({id, pass, results, attestedAt}); `insumer-attest-v2` → ES256 over the domain-separated, canonical preimage \"insumer.attestation.v2\\n\" + recursive sorted-key canonical JSON of {v:2, id, pass, results, attestedAt} (keys sorted at every level, no whitespace: this is the RFC 8785 / JCS canonical form, so any RFC 8785 serializer reproduces the bytes; all quantities are decimal strings and the only JSON numbers are bounded small integers, so the bytes never depend on a language's floating-point formatting), where the v2 `results[].evaluatedCondition.threshold` is a canonical decimal string and carries no `decimals` field. v1 stays byte-frozen. Verify with `npm install insumer-verify` or `pip install insumer-verify`.\n",
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "type": "object"
    },
    "meta": {
      "properties": {
        "creditsCharged": {
          "description": "1 for standard, 2 for proof: merkle. 0 on x402-paid calls.",
          "type": "integer"
        },
        "creditsRemaining": {
          "description": "Credits left on the key after this call. null on x402-paid calls (creditsCharged is 0 there; the call was paid at the transport layer, not from stored credits).",
          "type": [
            "integer",
            "null"
          ]
        },
        "timestamp": {
          "format": "date-time",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "version": {
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "type": "object"
    },
    "ok": {
      "const": true,
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "type": "object"
}