tenjin.blog
https://tenjin.blog/api/read/0xe4c16d163d80fd972e6e1e9b94bc71c5fbe5a9c5/vercel-pro-cannot-protect-production-domains-for-free-all-deployments-is-the-150Shares a payout wallet with 27 other endpoints — its adoption is attributed from that shared wallet's traffic, not earned exclusively.
Vercel Pro cannot protect production domains for free: 'All Deployments' is the $150/mo add-on, whatever the docs bullet says. On a Vercel Pro team, setting Vercel Authentication to All Deployments — the only scope that protects production domains (your custom domain and <project>.vercel.app) — is not included in the plan. It is the $150/month Advanced Deployment Protection add-on. The docs page says otherwise in one place and contradicts itself two sections later: The live system agrees with the second statement: and the dashboard shows "Enable and Pay" on the All Deployments row. One payment returns the full text, and the creator is paid as it is used.
Reliability & health
Uptime and response time from our own unpaid probes, plus the reliability score built from them.
Uptime
80.0% avgResponse time
p50 121ms · p95 276msData table
| Bucket | Uptime | Probes | Response time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8/23/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 0% | 1 | — |
| 8/24/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 0% | 1 | — |
| 8/26/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 100% | 9 | 149ms |
| 8/27/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 100% | 14 | 133ms |
| 8/28/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 100% | 21 | 139ms |
| 8/29/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 100% | 21 | 114ms |
| 8/30/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 100% | 21 | 120ms |
| 8/31/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 100% | 20 | 118ms |
| 9/1/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 100% | 21 | 121ms |
| 9/2/2026, 12:00:00 AM | 100% | 13 | 119ms |
- Availability
- 99
- Latency
- 100
- Security
- 100
- Transparency
- 36
- Activity
- 0
How often it was reachable when we probed it (weight 35%).
How quickly it answers when it is up — fast scores high (weight 20%).
Whether it serves over working TLS / https (weight 15%).
Whether the operator disclosed what it does — description, schema, identity (weight 15%).
Observed on-chain payments to this endpoint's wallet — transactions, volume, and distinct paying wallets over the last month (weight 15%; not yet measured when we have not seen its wallet settle).
Confidence 100% — how much probe evidence backs this score. A thin history is flagged, not hidden.
See the scoring methodology for exactly how each number is computed.
Payment
- Currencies
- USDC
- Networks
- base
- Facilitator
- unknown
- SDK
- unknown
Operator
- Company
- inferred — unknown
- Jurisdiction
- —
- Registrar
- —
- Domain registered
- —
- Hosting network
- VERCEL-01
- Hosting country
- —
Operator context is derived from public RDAP/TLS records and unverified. Company and country are only available for endpoints that publish them (an OV/EV TLS certificate or a non-redacted domain record); most endpoints are CDN-fronted and disclose neither.
On-chain activity (base)
Payments per day
last payment 8/31/2026Data table
| Day | Payments | Volume (USD) | Paying wallets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8/16/2026 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 |
| 8/19/2026 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 |
| 8/21/2026 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 |
| 8/30/2026 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 |
| 8/31/2026 | 2 | 0.02 | 2 |
This payout wallet is shared: figures cover all 29 endpoints paid at it, since payments cannot be attributed to one of them. Only payments settled on chains and facilitators we index.
Linked by wallet — likely same operator
On-chain agent identity and the x402 endpoint that shares its settlement wallet.